|
Post by The Host on Nov 20, 2006 20:00:34 GMT -5
Willard, please post your closing statement here. Remember, this is your last chance to convince the jury why you should get their votes.
|
|
|
Post by Willard on Dec 5, 2006 15:47:58 GMT -5
I actually planned to go through my game, much like Ian did, but since we played almost the same, I won't repeat everything.
The main difference between my game and Ian's is that I always kept the door open to different options (Like Coby and Bobby Jon), compared to Ian who didn't ever think about backstabbing anyone before I made him realize it was the only way we could go to make it to F2.
Of course, those options I had kept around revealed themselves as unnecessary since our main plan worked just fine all along. But if something bad had happened at any point, I think I would have had an easier time adapting myself than Ian, who had basically nothing to hold onto after Wanda was voted out. I think it showed since I never was anyone's target in the whole game even though I won immunity only once.
I have no regrets about the way I played the game. I realize some things I done may have hurt some people, but it is a game and that is what I felt I had to do.
I promised you honest answers, no bullnuts, and that is what you got from me. Unlike others, I didn't try to suck up to you, jurors, and even if you don't respect the way I played, I'm fine with it. I said Ian played mostly a perfect game, and I still believe that. He outwitted everyone on the jury, he really did. But now I ask you to vote for who you think played the best strategical game, who outwitted everyone else, even the other person in the Final Two.
Thank you!
|
|